This week comScore announced the release of comScore 360. Instead of estimating audience size solely off a 2mm panel, comScore 360 will operate on a hybrid model — information from partner sites that implement the comScore beacon will be layered on top of panel data. This should give media planners a better view of audience size compared to just site user counts, which are inflated by cookie deletion, or just panel information, which is distorted by the relatively small sample. For a better understanding of how difficult it is to measure online audience, I recommend Quantcast’s Cookie Corrected Audience Data whitepaper.
A hybrid model is a big step forward for the “Gold Standard” of audience measurement tools, but it still doesn’t address the new challenges faced by media planners. As the “People, not Pages” approach gains greater acceptance, media planners will be less focused on choosing one media property over another. Instead of choosing between Maxim.com and AskMen.com, planners will choose between two ad networks offering the same segment targeting men 18-25 with an interest in fashion. But what is the reach and composition for each of the two ad networks offering that same segment? Right now, there is no independent 3rd party audience verification tool for targeted media. This is fine for direct response marketers, where targeting is simply a means to a very measurable end: online response rates. But for brand marketers who define success as reach and frequency against a key demographic, independent audience verification is key. Focusing on “People, Not Pages” allows marketers to be much more accurate and efficient, but marketers need assurance that they are getting what they pay for.
How do you see this issue being resolved? Through survey companies like Vizu and InsightExpress? Measurement companies like comScore? Pure-play data vendors like BlueKai? Data/media vendors like Aperture? I’m curious to hear your thoughts.
-
John Ebbert
-
greghills