<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Greg Hills &#187; Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greghills.com/category/metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greghills.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Digital Media, Technology, and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A New School of Thinking: 10 Trends for Marketing Campaigns</title>
		<link>http://greghills.com/2010/05/07/a-new-school-of-thinking-10-trends-for-marketing-campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://greghills.com/2010/05/07/a-new-school-of-thinking-10-trends-for-marketing-campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greghills.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Thanks to @adexchanger for publishing the original of this post, which I'm now reblogging.]
As our industry continues to rationalize the way brands buy advertising, we&#8217;ve seen plenty of new companies and products pop up. Some provide solutions to old advertising problems, like universal frequency capping. Others deal with fresh challenges, like how to handle tens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-124" title="old school new school" src="http://greghills.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/old-school-new-school.jpg" alt="old school new school" width="425" height="239" /></p>
<p>[Thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/adexchanger">@adexchanger</a> for <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-agents/new-school-of-thinking/">publishing the original of this post</a>, which I'm now reblogging.]</p>
<p>As our industry continues to rationalize the way brands buy advertising, we&#8217;ve seen plenty of new companies and products pop up. Some provide solutions to old advertising problems, like universal frequency capping. Others deal with fresh challenges, like how to handle tens of thousands of real time bidding requests per second.</p>
<p>Despite the rapid pace of innovation, I think its possible to identify 10 larger trends that will continue to operate for years. Taken together they represent not just a bunch of complementary technologies and organizational challenges, but rather a new school of thought &#8212; a new way to to think about, plan, and execute marketing campaigns.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><strong><em>Old School</em></strong></td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;"><strong><em>New School</em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Buying Pages</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>1</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Buying Audience</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Forward Markets</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>2</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Spot Markets</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Sellside Optimizes For Both Advertiser Performance And Publisher Yields</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>3</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Sellside Optimizes For Publisher Yield While Buyside Optimizes For Advertiser Performance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Sellside Aggregates Audience</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>4</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Everyone (Sellside, Buyside, Intermediaries) Aggregates Audience</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Technology Is Strategic For The Sellside And Tactical For The Buyside</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>5</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Technology Is Strategic For Everyone</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Agencies Work To Foster Internal Collaboration Between Digital And Non-Digital Buyers</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>6</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Agencies Work To Foster Internal Collaboration Between Buyers Of Display And Buyers Of Site Integrations And HPTO&#8217;s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Buy Instructions And Optimization Instructions Submitted Via Email Phone &amp; Fax</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>7</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Buy Instructions And Optimization Instructions Submitted Via API</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Testing Cycles Of 4-12 Weeks For Brand Metrics And Media Performance</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>8</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Testing Cycles Of 4-12 Days For Brand Metrics And Media Performance</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Agencies Allocate Dollars Manually Based On Publisher&#8217;s Reach, Brand Equity And Perceived Value</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>9</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Agencies Allocate Dollars Through Automation, Based On Modeling Of Projected Returns On Ad Spend</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Agencies Rely On A/B Testing For Learning</td>
<td align="center">
<h1>10</h1>
</td>
<td align="center">Agencies Use Exploratory Data Analysis For Learning, As Well As A/B Testing</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greghills.com/2010/05/07/a-new-school-of-thinking-10-trends-for-marketing-campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010: The Year of Ad Visibility</title>
		<link>http://greghills.com/2009/12/14/2010-the-year-of-ad-visibility/</link>
		<comments>http://greghills.com/2009/12/14/2010-the-year-of-ad-visibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Hills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad visibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eyewonder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lotame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realvu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greghills.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertisers bidding on media inventory now have a wealth of information on individual ad impressions and the audience behind them.
Much of this data has only become available recently and there is going to be a tremendous amount of learning in 2010 about what data is most important.
One new kind of data is ad visibility, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Advertisers bidding on media inventory now have a wealth of information on individual ad impressions and the audience behind them.<br />
Much of this data has only become available recently and there is going to be a tremendous amount of learning in 2010 about what data is most important.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">One new kind of data is ad visibility, which reflects how long an ad was visible to a user, if at all. Online advertisers currently pay for ads that are placed on portions of the page the user never sees, often because the user doesn&#8217;t scroll all the way down the page. <a href="http://www.mpire.com/home.page">Mpire</a>, a company working on ad visibility, reports that <a href="http://blog.adxpose.com/2009/04/adxpose-4-in-10-online-ads-never-appear.html ">as many as 40% of all display ads are never seen</a> by consumers. That&#8217;s a whole lot of ads and a whole lot of advertising dollars wasted.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Digital marketers have been aware of the ad visibility issue but I think 2010 is the year where we&#8217;ll see it enter the mainstream conversation. Here&#8217;s why:<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>In an environment that is increasingly driven by quantitative analysis of performance, ad visibility is the single data point that is most predictive of performance. </strong>You don’t need to perform any statistical analysis to understand that an unseen ad is totally worthless. Imperfect reporting in major adserving platforms like DART and Atlas currently allows an unseen ad to receive credit for driving a purchase. But it is only a matter of time before these systems advance and unseen ads are recognized for what they really are &#8212; a big drag on campaign performance.</span></span><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>More and more ad technology companies are offering on ad visibility. </strong>Tracking ad visibility requires additional javascript code, but more and more companies are beginning to report on the metric. Here are a few of the companies who have started offering ad visibility in the last year.<br />
</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> Lotame’s <a href="http://www.lotame.com/press/releases/15/">Time Spent</a> technology </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://www.realvu.net/">RealVu</a>, a dedicated ad visibility reporting platform<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> <a href="http://www.adometry.com/">Adometry</a>, a custom reporting platform which includes<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Eyewonder&#8217;s <a href="http://reports.eyewonder.com/trk/login.cfm">Ad Visibility</a> reporting suite<br />
</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">MPire&#8217;s <a href="http://www.adxpose.com/home.page">adXpose</a> </span></span><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">reporting product</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Eyeblaster&#8217;s <a href="http://www.eyeblaster.com/Content.aspx?page=resource&amp;id=45">Dwell Time</a> reporting [authors note: added 12/16/09]</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>Ad visibility is well positioned from a market perspective to achieve widespread adoption.</strong> Big advertisers have a lot to gain through ad visibility reporting. </span></span><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">By measuring the most basic performance driver for their advertising, advertisers can better manage their media buying. </span></span><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In the future, advertisers might insist that they only pay for ad impressions that are actually seen by consumers. Big publishers also would stand to gain if ad visibility becomes a key metric. Since ads are more highly visible on professionally produced content pages where users spend more time, ad visibility would allow premium publishers to claw back ad dollars from the long tail. David Cohen of Universal McCann <a href="http://umwwblog.com/2009/11/02/this-could-change-everything/">points out</a> that MSNBC has already formed a partnership with RealVu, a company that provides ad visibility reporting. Many of the recent advances in display advertising practices, and the resulting shifts in revenue, have benefiting advertisers and the long-tail, at the expense of major publishers. Ad visibility is unique because it aligns the interests of advertisers and publishers.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The importance of ad visibility is common sense. And based on my view of the market, I think it will be recognized as such in 2010.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greghills.com/2009/12/14/2010-the-year-of-ad-visibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
